Physics Learning using Constructivism Approach in Palembang High School


  • Nursanti Maulia SMA Negeri 1 Tanjung Lubuk
  • Tri Widayatsih Universitas PGRI Palembang



Constructivism Approach, High School, Physics Education


The goal of this research is to produce education that is more meaningful. To achieve this goal, it is important to select media and educational strategies that can help students truly understand and participate fully in the teaching and learning process. In order to encourage students to think and understand the subject matter rather than just hear, receive, and remember it, as well as to be able to develop students’ thinking abilities in achieving learning outcomes, the researcher chose constructivism education that was centered on students. This educational approach of constructivism was applied in pairs. the greatest. With a sequential exploratory design, this research is a type of qualitative and quantitative research in which qualitative methods are used in the first stage and quantitative methods in the second. The research information was gathered through observations, interviews, documentation, and exams to gauge the physics knowledge of the students and the success of this study. According to the research findings, there are variations between the pre-test and post-test learning outcomes for the experimental class employing the constructivism approach in physics teaching. Based on the outcomes, it can be concluded that the educational paradigm employed, particularly the constructivism method, produces superior outcomes.


Bowen, P. W., Rose, R., & Pilkington, A. (2017). Mixed methods-theory and practice. Sequential, explanatory approach. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), 10.

Kalina, C., & Powell, K. C. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250.

Koballa, T. R., & Chiapetta, E. L. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary school. New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational technology research and development, 41(3), 4-16.

Moss, G. (2016). Knowledge, education and research: Making common cause across communities of practice. British Educational Research Journal, 42(6), 927-944.

Mundilarto. (2010). Penilaian hasil belajar fisika [Assessment of physics learning outcomes]. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan Instruktional Sains

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative report, 12(2), 281-316.

Pelealu, F, T. (2015). Penerapan Pendekatan Konstruktivismeme dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMP Negeri 1 Remboken [Application of the Constructivism Approach in Indonesian Language Learning at SMP Negeri 1 Remboken] (Tesis Magister). Universitas Manado, Indonesia.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18(2), 119-144.

Sleeter, C. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 24(8), 1947-1957.

Spiro, R. J. (2012). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 177-220). Routledge.

Suparlan. (2019). Theory of Constructivism in Learning: Islam and Education, 1(2).

Swift, A. (2019). Political philosophy: a beginners' guide for students and politicians. John Wiley & Sons.




How to Cite

Maulia, N., & Widayatsih, T. (2023). Physics Learning using Constructivism Approach in Palembang High School. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 2(2), 210–223.