Eco-MagneTech Playground: A Prototype for Integrating STEM and Sustainability in Primary Education

Nievesh Nair Surendren; Thiyagu Karupaiah

doi:10.59175/pijed.v5i1.878

Authors

Nievesh Nair Surendren St. Michael’s Institution (SK ST Michael, Ipoh), Malaysia
Thiyagu Karupaiah St. Michael’s Institution (SK ST Michael, Ipoh), Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v5i1.878

Keywords:

Critical Thinking Skill, Hands-on Learning, Primary Science Education, STEM Education

Abstract

A conceptual prototype that integrates STEM learning for primary school students is needed. In this study, a prototype demonstration approach was employed using Eco-MagneTech Playground, involving 32 primary school students aged 12 from a school in the Kinta Utara District. This study employed a qualitative research method. The design and development of the Eco-MagneTech Playground incorporated elements such as solar-powered streetlights, magnetic playground concepts, and a conceptual anti-cosmic radiation jogging track. The findings revealed notable student engagement, and students’ understanding of renewable energy and magnetism. Students’ questioning skill and evaluative skill provided evidence of emerging critical thinking skills. The Eco-MagneTech Playground is highly potential as an alternative tool to traditional textbook-based science teaching and learning. Unlike traditional classroom-based learning, the Eco-MagneTech Playground promotes active learning and critical thinking among primary school students. It also offers teachers an engaging approach to integrating STEM education through play-based learning environments. Further recommendations for future research were also suggested.

References

Ahmad, J., & Siew, N. M. (2022). An entrepreneurial science thinking module based on the socioscientific issues approach with thinking wheel map for primary school students in STEM education. Problems of Education in The 21st Century, 80(1), 30-50. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.30

Akkaya, M. M., & Benzer, S. (2020). The effect of STEM practices on academic achievement and attitudes of sixth grade students: An application on the unit of force and motion. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(2), 36-47.

Amrina, Z., Alfino, J., Sari, S. G., & Hahsa, N. (2024). Analysis of critical thinking, creative thinking and problem solving skills on elementary school students: a descriptive correlation study. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(2), 784-791. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp784-791

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of Inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 12(1), 251-281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216

Anvarovna, A. M., & Sayfullayevich, M. A. (2024). Developing creative thinking skills among primary school students. Nanotechnology Perceptions, 20(2), 224-231.

Aris, N. M., Ibrahim, N. H., & Halim, N. D. (2024). Beyond the classroom: Expert teachers’ perspectives on developing innovation competencies through design thinking practices. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 17(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol17.1.7.2024

Butai, S. N., Awang, H., Ismail, I. H., & Eldy, E. F. (2021). Effectiveness of PBL-STEM module in physics on students' interest: A preliminary finding of implementation amongst students in rural areas of Sabah, Malaysia. Transactions on Science and Technology, 380-387.

Chang, C.-C., & Yen, W.-H. (2023). The role of learning style in engineering design thinking via project-based STEM course. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 1125-1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1957776

Combs, L. B., Cennamo, K. S., & Newbill, P. L. (2009). Developing critical and creative thinkers: Toward a conceptual model of creative and critical thinking processes. Educational Technology, 49(5), 3-14.

Dalton, B., Morocco, C. C., Tivnan, T., & Mead, P. L. (1997). Supported inquiry science: Teaching for conceptual change in urban and suburban science classrooms. Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 30(6), 670-684. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000611

Dotson, M. E., Alvarez, V., Tackett, M., Asturias, G., Leon, I., & Ramanujam, N. (2020). Design thinking-based STEM learning: Preliminary results on achieving scale and sustainability through the IGNITE model. Curriculum, Instruction, And Pedagogy, 5, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00014

Gencer, A. S., & Dogan, H. (2020). The assessment of the fifth-grade students’ science critical thinking skills through design-based STEM education. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(4), 690-714. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.744640

Ghavimi, A., Schuessler, F., & Pesch, R. (2025). A framework to evaluate public green spaces with an emphasis on recreational values for sustainable urban and rural areas: A systematic review and content analysis. Heliyon, 11(2), e41553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41553

Ghazali, A., Mohamad Ashari, Z., & Ali, A. (2024). The importance of STEM education in 21st-century learning from the perspectives of pre-service kindergarten teachers: A survey study. 1st Global Waqf International Conference 2024

Haron, H., Kamaruddin, S. A., Harun, H., Abas, H., & Salim, K. R. (2017). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics initiatives at rural schools and its impact on learning motivation. Journal of Physics, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596%2F1174%2F1%2F012002

Hernández, R. (2012). Collaborative learning: Increasing students’ engagement outside the classroom. US-China Education Review, 804-812.

Institute of Physics. (2025). Cosmic rays. https://www.iop.org/explore-physics/physics-around-you/understanding-surroundings/cosmic-rays

Ismail, M. H., Fadzil, H. M., Saat, R. M., & Salleh, M. F. (2022). A Needs analysis study for the preparation of integrated STEM instructional practices through scientist-teacher-student partnership (STSP). ASM Science Journal, 17, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2022.1112

Jamaludin, J., Fah, L. Y., Khan, C. G., Hoon, K. C., & Yee, A. L. (2020). Development of STEM teaching module for rural primary schools in Sabah: Need analysis with justification and key features. Learning Science and Mathematics, 15(1), 30-39.

Kalpana, T. (2014). A Constructivist perspective on teaching and learning: A conceptual framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 27-29.

Karupaiah, T., & Saleh, S. (2025a). Challenges in integrating design thinking and resources utilisation in science classrooms: A qualitative exploration of the Malaysian classrooms. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 7(2), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2025.7.2.5

Karupaiah, T., & Saleh, S. (2025b). Malaysian science teachers’ needs for a design thinking-based STEM module in year four physical science. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 15(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol15.1.9.2025

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Klarin, M. (2016). Conceptual challenges in understanding innovative education in organizational context. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 4(1), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1601067K

Ladachart, L., Radchanet, V., Phornprasert, W., & Phothong, W. (2024). Influence of different approaches to design-based learning on eighth grade students’ science content learning and STEM identity. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 19(2), 300-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2023.2230961

Landscape Structures Inc. (2024). Materials matter: Sustainable and durable playground components. Retrieved November 10, 2025, from https://www.playlsi.com/en/playground-planning-tools/design-philosophy/materials-matter/materials-matter/

Linnansaari, J., Viljaranta, J., Lavonen, J., Schneider, B., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). Finnish students’ engagement in science lessons. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(2), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.2047

Ministry Of Education. (2018). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Sains Tahun 4. Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

O’Reilly, C., Devitt, A., & Hayes, N. (2022). Critical thinking in the preschool classroom - A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101110

PlayPower, Inc. (2021, September 21). PlayPower introduces solar-powered PlaySoleil® lighting for playgrounds at NRPA annual conference. Retrieved November 10, 2025, from https://playpower.com/playpower-introduces-solar-powered-playsoleil-lighting-for-playgrounds-at-nrpa-annual-conference/

Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626

Ridzuwan, A. Z., Halim, L., & Mohammad, W. M. (2024). A Conceptual framework of teacher and student strategies in the use of science textbooks through a systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 14(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol14.2.1.2024

Samara, V., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). A teaching intervention for magnetism using STEM in kindergarten. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/13667

Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and evaluation of an integrated project-based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017-1033. https://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.1017

Sipon, S., Othman, M. Z., Rahim, F., Norwai, N., & Ahmad, R. (2021). The effects of integrating STEM education through STEM module: Towards a skilled workforce and consistent learning society. E-Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Islam dan Sains 2021 (p. 940=953). Negeri Sembilan: Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.

Solis, S. L., Curtis, K. N., & Hayes-Messinger, A. (2017). Children’s exploration of physical phenomena during object play. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(1), 122–140.

Sustiningsih, Utaminingsih, S., & Santoso. (2021). Development of science teaching materials based on STEM: A needs analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012081

Tan, R. M., Yangco, R. T., & Que, E. N. (2020). Students' conceptual understanding and science process skills in an inquiry-based flipped classroom environment. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 159-184. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.7

Tiong, G. H., & Bakar, A. Y. (2022). The engagement of critical and creative thinking activities in the teaching and learning process. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(2), 139-146.

Üret, A., & Ceylan, R. (2021). Exploring the effectiveness of STEM education on the creativity of 5-year-old kindergarten children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(6), 842-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1913204

Vasileva, O., & Balyasnikova, N. (2019). (Re)Introducing Vygotsky’s thought: From historical overview to contemporary psychology. Front. Psychol., 10, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01515

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Xie, Y., & Reider, D. (2014, June). Integration of innovative technologies for enhancing students’ motivation for science learning and career. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9469-1

Yopp, R. H. (2006). Enhancing hands-on science experiences with informational texts: Learning about pine cones. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 43(3), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.3200/SATS.43.3.31-34