Classroom Management for Prospective Elementary School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i1.416Keywords:
Classroom Management, Field Experience Practice, MicroteachingAbstract
This study aims to explore the classroom management practices of student teachers in the Elementary School Education (PGMI) Study Program at the Faculty of Tarbiyah IAIN Kudus. This research uses a case study approach, involving students of the PGMI Study Program at the Faculty of Tarbiyah IAIN Kudus in conceptual and practical learning related to classroom management. Data collection was carried out using semi-structured interview techniques with student participants regarding the experience of classroom management practices, passive observation presented in the form of visual micro-teaching practices and field experience practices, as well as documentation of the study program curriculum which contains a cluster of classroom management courses. While analyzing the data of this study using thematic analysis. The findings of this study explore that the readiness of PGMI IAIN Kudus study program students in micro-teaching practice as a forum for how practitioners simultaneously and alternately play roles, both as teachers, students, and even observers (observers, supervisors), while PPL as a forum for real practice and self-development in the frame of education, both formal, non-formal, and informal become a reality.
References
Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 1970, 492–505. https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). International review of research in open and distributed learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1067616ar
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391–409.
Brophy, J. (1988). Educating Teachers About Managing Students. Classrooms Major teaching functions, 4(Teacher & Teacher Education), 1–18.
Clark, A., Holland, C., Katz, J., & Peace, S. (2009). Learning to see: Lessons from a participatory observation research project in public spaces. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802268587
Czekanski, K., & Wolf, Z. (2013). Encouraging and Evaluating Class Participation. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.10.1.7
D. C. Berliner. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 463–482.
Date, P. U. B., Type, P. U. B., & Price, E. (2000). Document resume.
DeLuca, C., Shulha, J., Luhanga, U., Shulha, L. M., Christou, T. M., & Klinger, D. A. (2015). Collaborative inquiry as a professional learning structure for educators: a scoping review. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 640–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.933120
Diez, R., Dominguez, A., Ponsoda, S., & Ortuño, B. (2021). Social science pedagogy as a way of integrating sustainable education and global citizenship into the initial training of pre‐primary teachers. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(3), 975–989. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030072
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
Elliott, V. F. (2018). The qualitative report : an online journal dedicated to qualitative research since 1990. Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:5304bf7f-6214-4939-9f1b-b64415d4fac1
Heinrich, A. J., Marguin, S., Million, A., & Stollmann, J. (2024). Handbook of qualitative and visual methods in spatial research. In Handbook of Qualitative and Visual Methods in Spatial Research. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839467343
Houser, M. L., & Frymier, A. B. (2009). The role of student characteristics and teacher behaviors in students’ learner empowerment. Communication Education, 58(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802237383
Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2016). A critical analysis of the role of wait time in classroom interactions and the effects on student and teacher interactional behaviours. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1009365
Jack, E. P., & Raturi, A. S. (2006). Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research. Management Research News, 29(6), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610683833
Joshi, D., A. Gokhale, V., & Acharya, A. (2012). Student’s Response and Behavior in the Classroom Environment. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 2(Special 1), 926–934. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2012.0132
Lerman, D. C., & Vorndran, C. M. (2002). on the Status of Knowledge for Using Punishment: Implications for Treating Behavior Disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(4), 431–464. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-431
Liao, Y.-C., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Karlin, M., Glazewski, K., & Brush, T. (2017). Supporting Change in Teacher Practice: Examining Shifts of Teachers’ Professional Development Preferences and Needs for Technology Integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 522–548.
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., Macqueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Family Health International (FHI), USA.
Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The Key to Classroom Management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6–13.
Morgan, D. L., & Nica, A. (2020). Iterative Thematic Inquiry: A New Method for Analyzing Qualitative Data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118
O’Donnell, A. M. (2001). Group Processes in the Classroom. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/02425-6
Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies. In Educational Research and Innovation, OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en
Perle, J. G. (2018). Teacher-Provided Positive Attending to Improve Student Behavior. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(4), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918757954
Rohmah, I. I. T. (2021). Microteaching: Preparation and Performance.
Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing School Reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(2), 149–164.
Schuitema, J., Radstake, H., van de Pol, J., & Veugelers, W. (2018). Guiding classroom discussions for democratic citizenship education. Educational Studies, 44(4), 377–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1373629
Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90016-9
Tholibon, D. A., Nujid, M. M., Mokhtar, H., Rahim, J. A., Rashid, S. S., Saadon, A., Tholibon, D., & Salam, R. (2022). The factors of students’ involvement on student-centered learning method. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(4), 1637–1646. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22314
Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(7). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe777155
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (1993). Building school communities: An experienced-based model. Phi Delta Kappan, 12(July), 324–328.
Wettstein, A., Ramseier, E., & Scherzinger, M. (2021). Class- and subject teachers’ self-efficacy and emotional stability and students’ perceptions of the teacher–student relationship, classroom management, and classroom disruptions. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00606-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ismanto Ismanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
