Development of Pencak Silat Collaboration Test Instruments for Pencak Silat Athletes in Jambi City

Muhamar Kodafi Putra

doi:10.59175/pijed.v2i2.131

Authors

Muhamar Kodafi Putra Universitas Dharmas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v2i2.131

Keywords:

Athletes, Collaboration Test Instrument, Pencak Silat, Punch and Kick

Abstract

In this research journal, the writer or researcher wants to conduct research on the Development of a Pencak Silat Punch and Kick Collaborative Test Instrument for Pencak Silat Athletes in the City of Jambi. The method used in this research is research and development. The sample used was 16 pencak silat athletes in Jambi City. The results of the study “Development of a Pencak Silat Punch and Kick Collaborative Test Instrument for Jambi City Athletes” were categorized as suitable as a punch and kick collaboration test instrument that could measure the speed and strength of each the punches and kicks of Jambi City’s pencak silat athletes. This can be seen from the results of the assessment of media experts, namely 91.88%, test and measurement experts 100.00%, and material experts in pencak silat 100.00% and based on the results of medium-scale trials, namely 96.30%.

References

Azwar, S. (2000). Reliability and Validity. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sugiyono, D. (2017). Statistics for Research. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626

Farrer, D. (2006). “Deathscapes” of the Malay Martial Artist. Social Analysis, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.3167/015597706780886076

Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The Reliability Paradox: Why Robust Cognitive Tasks Do Not Produce Reliable Individual Differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Melsayanti, R. (2019). Students’ Attitude Towards Natural Sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(3), 455. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3. 16395

Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919879695

Reynolds, C. R., Altmann, R. A., & Allen, D. N. (2021). The Problem of Bias in Psychological Assessment. In Mastering Modern Psychological Testing (pp. 573–613). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59455-8_15

Salomon, G. (2012). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning: An exploration of how symbolic forms cultivate mental skills and affect knowledge acquisition. Routledge.

Trockel, M., Bohman, B., Lesure, E., Hamidi, M. S., Welle, D., Roberts, L., & Shanafelt, T. (2018). A Brief Instrument to Assess Both Burnout and Professional Fulfillment in Physicians: Reliability and Validity, Including Correlation with Self-Reported Medical Errors, in a Sample of Resident and Practicing Physicians. Academic Psychiatry, 42(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s40596-017-0849-3