Public Trust, Ethic and Integrity in the Bureaucracy

Authors

  • Ahd Fauzi Universitas Islam Nusantara (UNINUS) Bandung
  • Rita Sukaesih Universitas Islam Nusantara (UNINUS) Bandung
  • Sofyan Sauri Universitas Islam Nusantara (UNINUS) Bandung
  • Sri Handayani Universitas Islam Nusantara (UNINUS) Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v1i2.16

Keywords:

Bureaucracy, Government, Society

Abstract

It is critical to comprehend the requirement for a bureaucracy that is ethical, has integrity, and is devoid of corruption, collusion, and nepotism. This research seeks information on how public trust, ethics, and integrity in government exist in society. The technique employed in this study corresponds to descriptive analysis research principles, although in technical execution, this research is designed as an endeavor to interpret information rather than building or testing a hypothesis. According to the findings of this study, trust is extremely crucial for any institution or organization. To create and strengthen public faith in the government, including good will, leaders carry out their mandated tasks, leaders in their organizations follow all applicable rules, and government officials perform better.

References

Arimuladi, S. U., Utama, Y. J., & Asmara, T. (2022). The Meaning of the Integrity Zone in the Prosecutor’s Office: A Study of Legal Hermeneutics. Yuridika, 37(1), 59–74.

Bawono, S. K., Briando, B., & Sohirin. (2021). Revisiting Immigration Apparatus’ Code of Ethics By Panca Bhakti Insan Imigrasi Values Internalisation. International Journal of Religious and Cultural Studies, 3(2), 133–144.

de Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Strüwer, T. (2018). Integrity Violations and Corruption in Western Public Governance: Empirical Evidence and Reflection from the Netherlands. Public Integrity, 20(2), 131–149.

de Koning, M., Meyer, B., Moors, A., & Pels, P. (2019). Guidelines for anthropological research: Data management, ethics, and integrity. Ethnography, 20(2), 170–174.

Huberts, L. W. J. C. (2018). Integrity: What it is and Why it is Important. Public Integrity, 0(0), 1–15.

Pels, P., Boog, I., Henrike Florusbosch, J., Kripe, Z., Minter, T., Postma, M., Sleeboom-Faulkner, M., Simpson, B., Dilger, H., Schönhuth, M., von Poser, A., Castillo, R. C. A., Lederman, R., & Richards-Rissetto, H. (2018). Data management in anthropology: the next phase in ethics governance? Social Anthropology, 26(3), 391–413.

Plant, J. F. (2018). Responsibility in Public Administration Ethics. Public Integrity, 0(0), 1–13.

Riyanto, M., & Sayer, I. M. (2022). Teacher's Duties and Responsibilities. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 1(1), 74-90.

Sajari, A., Haron, H., & Ismail, I. (2017). Ethical climate, chief integrity officer and level of ethics and integrity in Malaysian public sector. FGIC 1st Conference on Governance & Integrity, 2017 “Innovation & Sustainability Through Governance,” April, 297–307.

Susanto, E., & Kumar, K. S. (2022). Duties and Responsibilities of Educational Management. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 1(1), 17-42.

Trisnamansyah, S., & Sauri, S. (2021). Implementation of Religious-Based Madrasah Performance Management For Improving Student ’ S Akhlakul Karimah at Madrasah Aliyah. Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies, 1(10), 1057–1067.

van Steden, R. (2020). Blind Spots in Public Ethics and Integrity Research: What Public Administration Scholars Can Learn from Aristotle. Public Integrity, 22(3), 236–244.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-13

How to Cite

Fauzi, A., Sukaesih, R., Sauri, S., & Handayani, S. (2022). Public Trust, Ethic and Integrity in the Bureaucracy. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 1(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v1i2.16