Mapping Electronic Module Research for Basic Education Literacy: Bibliometric Analysis (2014-2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.815Keywords:
Basic Education, Bibliometric Analysis, Electronic Modules, Learning LiteracyAbstract
This study aims to map the development of research on electronic modules for learning literacy at the elementary school level through a bibliometric analysis approach. The research data was obtained from the Scopus database with a publication range of 2014-2024, using keywords related to electronic modules, learning literacy, and elementary education. The analysis was conducted using VOSviewer (version 1.6.19) and Biblioshiny to identify trends in publication growth, productive journals and sources, contributions by authors, institutions, and countries, as well as patterns of collaboration and co-occurrence of keywords. The analysis shows that research on electronic modules for learning literacy in elementary schools has increased consistently, with a significant surge in the period 2020-2024. Journals in the field of educational technology and digital learning are the main sources of publication, while research contributions are still dominated by countries with established educational technology infrastructure. Keyword analysis shows a shift in research focus from the technical aspects of module development to greater attention to pedagogical impact, student engagement, and the strengthening of higher-order thinking skills. Overall, this research provides a comprehensive overview of the direction and structure of research on electronic modules for learning literacy in elementary schools, and can be a reference for researchers and practitioners of elementary education in developing more contextual and effective digital teaching materials.
References
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2018). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2019). Teacher cognition and technology integration in language education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1587782
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–12.
Kemdikbud. (2020). Distance learning guide during the COVID-19 emergency. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Nisa, K., Suryani, N., & Suharno. (2020). The effectiveness of interactive e-modules to improve students’ learning motivation in elementary school. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(4), 567–575.
OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2020). Education responses to COVID-19: Embracing digital learning and online collaboration. OECD Publishing.
Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: A model for educational technology integration. Hippasus.
Rahmawati, Y., Ridwan, A., & Hartono. (2021). Digital learning materials and literacy development in elementary schools. Journal of Primary Education, 10(3), 201–210.
Sari, D. P., & Setiawan, A. (2021). Development of literacy-based e-modules for elementary school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(2), 98–107.
Septyarini, E., & Puspitasari, R. (2022). Interactive e-modules to improve reading comprehension of elementary school students. Journal of Primary Education, 11(2), 145–154.
Sudjana, N., & Rivai, A. (2019). Teaching Media. Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Suryani, N., Setiawan, A., & Putria, A. (2018). Innovative learning media and its development. Remaja Rosdakarya.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Wijaya, A., Sudrajat, A., & Yulianti, D. (2021). Problem-based electronic modules to enhance critical thinking skills of elementary school students. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14325a
Yamin, M., & Syahrir. (2020). Development of digital literacy in elementary school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 5(1), 45–54.
Zainuddin, Z., Perera, C. J., Haruna, H., & Habiburrahim. (2019). Scaffolding flipped classroom using digital modules. Computers & Education, 135, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.007
Zhao, Y. (2018). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. Teachers College Press.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Acoci Acoci, Agustan Agustan, Sukmawati Sukmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
