Politeness Strategies and Diplomatic Identity: A Pragmatic Analysis of Prabowo Subianto’s UN General Assembly Speech

Authors

  • Ratnawati Ratnawati Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Sulastri Sulastri Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Nur Abidah Idrus Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.789

Keywords:

Intercultural Awareness, Political Communication, Prabowo Subianto, Pragmatic Politeness, United Nations Speech

Abstract

In political communication, language serves not only as a medium of communication but also as a strategic tool for diplomacy and image building. This study investigates the pragmatic politeness strategies employed by Prabowo Subianto in his United Nations General Assembly speech. This research aims to identify the types of pragmatic politeness strategies employed in his speech, uncover how these strategies reflect intercultural awareness and diplomatic intent. Guided by Searle’s (1979) speech act theory and Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory, this qualitative descriptive research analyzes the speech transcript through pragmatic analysis. The findings reveal that Prabowo utilizes four speech acts (assertive, directive, commissive, and expressive) and all politeness strategies (positive politeness, negative politeness, bald on record, and off record), such as solidarity, mitigating face threats in his speech to express solidarity, respect, and inclusivity toward a diverse global audience. These strategies reflect intercultural sensitivity by emphasizing respect, inclusivity, cooperation, aligning with the conventions of global political discourse, and achieving persuasive and diplomatic effects. Furthermore, the pragmatic functions of these strategies contribute to projecting Indonesia as a peace-oriented, collaborative, and globally responsible nation. The study highlights how pragmatic politeness in political communication serves diplomatic purposes, reinforces the role of language as a bridge in international relations. The study concludes that Prabowo’s strategic use of politeness is central to constructing Indonesia’s diplomatic identity as a collaborative and responsible global actor.

References

Abellan, P. A. (2025). Intonation and emotional framing in political rallies:A multimodal approach to populist political speech. Language & Communication, 105, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2025.08.003

Damilola Oluseyi Fafiyebi, S. A. (2023). A Pragmatic Study of Politeness Strategies in the Inaugural Speeches of Civilian Heads of Government in Nigeria. 5(5), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajll.2023.v05i05.001

Evi Lestaria, D. P. (2024). Analysis Politeness And Impoliteness Youtube Chanel"Prabowo Subianto Bicara Gagasan Mata Najwa. EDUJ: English Education Journal, 2(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.59966/eduj.v2i1.1055

Jazeri, M. (2018). Communication Culture in Political Debate in Indonesia. The 1st International Seminar on Language, Literature and Education (pp. 364-376). KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2698

Kesi, A. K. (2025). Pragmatic Analysis on Social Media (YouTube): Perlocutionary Speech Acts in Digital Communication in the Modern Era. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 11(1), 39-45.

Mohammad Ali Yafi, D. M. (2025). Managing Face: A Pragmatic Analysis of Political Interview Discourse in Indonesia. Journal of Pragmatic Research, 7(2), 483-510. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v7i2.483-510

Nurpadillah, V. (2019). Directive Speech Acts of Millennial Students and Lecturers in WhatsApp Groups. Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.29300/disastra.v1i2.1899

Penelope Brown, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Putri, A. N. A., Mansyur, A.S., & Abqoriyyah, F.H. (2025). Framing Conflict in Political Discourse: Positive and Negative Politeness of Bassem Youssef and Piers Morgan’s Debate. ELIF: English Language in Focus, 7(2), 105-110. DOI:

Rajik, J. (2025). Politeness Strategies in Political Discourse: A Study through the Lens of Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis, 4(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.32996/jpda.2025.4.1.4

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.

Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating Across Cultures. Guilford Press. New York: The Guilford Press.

Ummi Ashim Azzahra, H. P. (2023). Politeness Strategies Used by Trump and El-Sisi in Their Speeches at United Nations Assembly. English Education Journal, 13(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v13i1.68280

Venera Nagimovna Yapparova, J. V. (2019). Verbal Politeness as an Important Tool of Diplomacy. Journal of Politics and Law, 12(5), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v12n5p57

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Ratnawati, R., Sulastri, S., & Idrus, N. A. (2025). Politeness Strategies and Diplomatic Identity: A Pragmatic Analysis of Prabowo Subianto’s UN General Assembly Speech. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.789