Oral Discourse and Interaction in Early Childhood Education: A Case Study at PG-PAUD at Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Authors

  • Wa Ode Sari Amalia Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Munirah Munirah Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Akhir Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.816

Keywords:

Early Childhood Education, Oral Discourse, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Abstract

Oral discourse plays an important role in shaping the interaction and meaning-making process in early childhood teacher education. However, limited research has examined how classroom discourse is revealed in local contexts such as teacher training institutions in Indonesia. This study explores the patterns, functions, and implications of oral discourse in academic interaction in the Early Childhood Teacher Education Program (PG-PAUD) of the University of Muhammadiyah Kendari, which functions as a locus of inquiry. Using a qualitative research design with discourse analysis, data was collected through classroom recordings, direct observations, and semi-structured interviews with lecturers and students. The analysis focuses on identifying patterns of repetitive interactions, including initiation-response-feedback (IRF) sequences, negotiation of meaning, and the integration of local cultural and institutional values into discourse practices. The findings reveal that oral discourse is not only a medium for knowledge transmission but also a space to foster student participation, collaborative meaning-making, and strengthening cultural identity. In addition, the locus of Muhammadiyah’s higher education influences the way lecturers and students use language to balance academic rigor with moral and cultural values. These results underscore the importance of context-sensitive discourse studies in advancing the quality of teacher education. This study contributes to the growth of the literature on classroom discourse and offers practical insights for improving pedagogical practice in early childhood education programs.

References

Ahmed, A., Howe, C., Major, L., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., & Warwick, P. (2022). Developing a test of reasoning for preadolescents. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(5), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1990880

Brodin, J., care, K. R.-E. (2020). Improvement of preschool children’s speech and language skills; Early child development and careTaylor & Francis, 190(14), 2205–2213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1564917

Creativity, M. R.-T. S. (2023). Teachers’ presentation of higher-order thinking questions and student engagement: Missing out on HOT opportunities; Thinking Skills and Creativity; Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187123001803

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches ((4th ed.)). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publication.

Dumais, K., (2024). Empowering Academic Excellence: The Role of Organizational Student Leaders in a Culture of Learning, Collaboration, and Personal Growth; Global Business and Organizational Excellence; Researchgate.Net, 33(3), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOE.21542

Dwyer, C., (2020). An exploratory quantitative case study of critical thinking development through adult distance learning; Educational Technology Research and Development; Springer, 68(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-019-09659-2

Emeklioğlu, S., (2025). Localisation in language learning: a qualitative study on EFL instructors’ perspectives on culturally familiar content; Language, Culture and CurriculumTaylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2025.2488894

Estaji, M., (2023). Realization of initiation, response, and feedback in teacher-student interactions in EFL classrooms: Learning realities and opportunities; Discourse and InteractionElt.Tabrizu.Ac.Ir, 16(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2023-1-70

Fairclough, N. (2020). Language and Discourse*. Language in Use, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060994-23

Faisal, A., Pabbajah, M., Abdullah, I., Muhammad, N. E., & Rusli, M. (2022). Strengthening religious moderatism through the traditional authority of kiai in Indonesia; Cogent Social Sciences Taylor & Francis, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2150450

Farrelly, M. J., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2021). Strategies used and challenges faced by Thai EFL teachers when eliciting talk during classroom interactions in high school contexts; SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211050385

Garcia, M. C. (2020a). Professional dialogues to foster dialogic pedagogy in mathematics: design and test of a school-run teacher professional development programme; Dialogic Pedagogy; Dialogic Pedagogy, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003296744-18

Garcia, M. C. (2020b). Professional dialogues to foster dialogic pedagogy in mathematics: design and test of a school-run teacher professional development programme; Dialogic Pedagogy; H-Index: 5 SJR: Q2 CORE: NA ABDC: NA FT50: NA 1Dialogic Pedagogy; Dialogic Pedagogy, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003296744-18

Gunansyah, G., Ariadi, S., & Budirahayu, T. (2024). Depoliticization and marginalized critical environmental education: curriculum revision for empowering students as environmental agents; Curriculum Perspectives; Springer, 44(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41297-024-00253-Y

Hadley, E. B., Barnes, E. M., & Hwang, H. J. (2023). Purposes, places, and participants: A systematic review of teacher language practices and child oral language outcomes in early childhood classrooms; Early Education and Development; Taylor & Francis, 34(4), 862–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2074203

Hu, L., & Chen, G. (2022). Exploring turn-taking patterns during dialogic collaborative problem solving; Instructional Science; Springer, 50(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11251-021-09565-2

Hu, X., He, W., Chiu, T. K. F., & Zhao, L. (2023). Using a teacher scheme for educational dialogue analysis to investigate student–student interaction patterns for optimal group activities in an artificial intelligence; Education and Information Technologies; Springer, 28(7), 8789–8813. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-022-11556-W

Huang, A., Klein, M., & Beck, A. (2020). An exploration of teacher learning through reflection from a sociocultural and dialogical perspective: professional dialogue or professional monologue? Professional Development in Education; Taylor & Francis, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1787192

Irshad, S., Maan, M., Batool, H. (2021). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): An evaluative tool for language learning and social development in early childhood education; Multicultural Education; Academia.Edu. https://www.academia.edu/download/68050672/

Johnstone, B., & Andrus, J. (2024). Discourse analysisNANo ranking found for “The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.” The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.WBEAL1017

Ke, L., (2021). Supporting students’ meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches; Journal of Research in Science Teaching; Wiley Online Library, 58(3), 335–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.21662

Khong, T. D. H., Saito, E., Hardy, I., & Gillies, R. (2023). Teacher learning through dialogue with colleagues, self and students; Educational research; Taylor & Francis, 65(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2023.2192226

Lehesvuori, S., (2021). Exploring coherence and authorship in pedagogical link-making in science; International Journal of Science Education; Taylor & Francis, 43(17), 2791–2813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1991599

Liamputtong, P. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods. In Qualitative Research Methods (5th Edition). Oxford University Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook ((4th ed.)). SAGE Publications.

Natsir, M., Fazalani, R., Maldin, S. A., Suhartiwi, S., & Yanti, I. (2023). Children’s Language According to Phonological and Morphological Aspects in Vocal Learning at PAUD Al-Karimah “QOLAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama.” ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id, 15(2), 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.37680/QALAMUNA.V15I2.3560

Neufeld, K. (2025). Early Childhood Education and Religion Oriented Child Rearing: A Case of Quran Course of Presidency of Religious Affairs for 4-6 Years Old; Religious Education; Religious Education, 74(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408790740303

Petousi, V., (2020). Contextualising harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from discourse analysis of scientific publications; International Journal of Sustainable Development; Inderscienceonline.Com, 23(3–4), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2020.115206

Sanchez, S. (2023). Dialogic Teacher Inquiry: The Case of a Preservice Teacher Learning to Facilitate Class Discussion; Dialogic Pedagogy; ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1398180

Scholarworks, S., Dissertations, W., Studies, D., & Hickson, S. (2025). The effects of functional moves in teacher questioning on students’ contextualization of mathematical word problem solving; Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education; Springer, 28(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10857-023-09616-0

Sezer, B., Cetinkaya, F. (2021). A comparison of three read-aloud methods with children’s picture books in the Turkish language context: Just reading, performance-based reading, and interactional; Studies in Educational Evaluation; Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X20302224

Sofyan, M., Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., & Barnes, M. (2025). Unpacking the ethics of care and safe learning environments in Indonesian vocational higher education settings: a contested space of power and (teaching); Pedagogy, Culture & Society; Taylor & Francis, 33(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2187437

Soysal, Y., & Soysal, S. (2023). Relationship Between a Teacher Educator’s Questions and the Development of Prospective Teachers’ Critical Thinking; ECNU Review of Education, 6(1), 105–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221107028

Tan, L., Zammit, K., D’warte, J., & Gearside, A. (2020). Assessing multimodal literacies in practice: A critical review of its implementations in educational settings; Language and Education; Taylor & Francis, 34(2), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2019.1708926

Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and; Journal of IntelligenceMdpi.Com. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/3/54

Tong, Z., An, F., Heliyon, Y. C. (2024). Exploring teacher discourse patterns: Comparative insights from novice and expert teachers in junior high school EFL contexts; Heliyon; Cell.Com. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)12466-8

Utomo, C., (2020). An integrated teaching tolerance in learning history of Indonesian national movement at higher education; Journal of Social Studies Education Research; Learntechlib.Org. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217736/

Walldén, R., (2022). Joining the adventures of Sally Jones–Discursive strategies for providing access to literary language in a linguistically diverse classroom; Linguistics and education; Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589822001097

Weisi, H., & Ahmadi, R. (2024). Conceptualizing student voice in teacher-student curriculum partnerships within Iran’s higher education; Higher Education; Springer, 87(3), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-023-01036-6

Weyant, E. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th Edition. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231

Yeager, D. S., Carroll, J. M., Buontempo, J., Cimpian, A., Woody, S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Murray, J., Mhatre, P., Kersting, N., Hulleman, C., Kudym, M., Murphy, M., Duckworth, A. L., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2022). Teacher mindsets help explain where a growth-mindset intervention does and doesn’t work; Psychological science, 33(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211028984

Zafrani, E., & Yarden, A. (2022). Dialog‐constraining institutional logics and their interactional manifestation in the science classroom; Science Education; Wiley Online Library, 106(1), 142–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.21687

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Amalia, W. O. S., Munirah, M., & Akhir, M. (2025). Oral Discourse and Interaction in Early Childhood Education: A Case Study at PG-PAUD at Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.816

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>