Development and Validation of Botani-Co: A Cognitive Botanical Literacy Instrument for University Students

Authors

  • Wiwin Pramita Arif Universitas Negeri Malang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Murni Sapta Sari Universitas Negeri Malang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Sri Rahayu Lestari Universitas Negeri Malang, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.825

Keywords:

Botanical Literacy, Cognitive Assessment, Instrument Development

Abstract

This study developed Botani-co (Botanical Literacy Instrument Cognitive) as an innovative and empirically validated tool to measure university students’ botanical literacy. The study aimed to: (1) develop a valid and reliable botanical literacy instrument based on the cognitive dimension, and (2) analyze the characteristics of cognitive test items, including difficulty level, discrimination index, and distractor effectiveness within the cognitive domain of botanical literacy. A Design and Development Research (DDR) approach was employed, consisting of two main phases: the design phase and the development phase. The design phase involved conceptual analysis, indicator formulation, and item construction, whereas the development phase included content validation, empirical testing, and construct analysis. The instrument was administered to 378 university students from various higher education institutions in Indonesia, selected through stratified random sampling based on gender and academic semester. Item analysis for the cognitive dimension produced an overall reliability coefficient (KR-20) of 0.86, indicating high internal consistency. The final instrument comprised 35 multiple-choice items that demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability across all psychometric criteria. The findings highlight the need to assess botanical literacy through a multidimensional framework, as understanding plants involves cognitive, affective, and psychomotor dimensions. Consequently, Botani-co can serve as both a diagnostic and evaluative instrument in biology education to strengthen students’ scientific literacy and ecological awareness, aligning with the objectives of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4.7 on education for sustainable development.

References

Akpınarlı, S. S., & Köseoğlu, P. (2025). From Perception to Sustainability: Validating a Tool to Assess Students’ Awareness of the Ecological, Utilitarian, and Cultural Roles of Plants. Sustainability, 17(12), 5540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125540

Arif, W. P., Sari, M. S., & Lestari, S. R. (2025). Unveiling the roots of botanical literacy: A systematic literature review on its concepts and domains. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(4), em2612. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16121

Dünser, B., Möller, A., Anđić, B., Lampert, P., Bergmann‐Gering, A., & Pany, P. (2025). (Re) growing plant awareness: A Delphi study. Plants, People, Planet, 7(4), 1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10617

Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2011). Plants have a chance: outdoor educational programmes alter students’ knowledge and attitudes towards plants. Environmental Education Research, 17(4), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.545874

Hubbard, K. (2024). Plant biology education: A competency‐based vision for the future. Plants, People, Planet, 6(4), 780–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10503

Marcos-Walias, J., Bobo-Pinilla, J., Delgado Iglesias, J., & Reinoso Tapia, R. (2023). Plant awareness disparity among students of different educational levels in Spain. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12570

Pany, P., Meier, F. D., Dünser, B., Yanagida, T., Kiehn, M., & Möller, A. (2024). Measuring students’ plant awareness: A prerequisite for effective botany education. Journal of Biological Education, 58(5), 1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2159491

Parsley, K. M., Daigle, B. J., & Sabel, J. L. (2022). Initial Development and Validation of the Plant Awareness Disparity Index. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0275

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2023). Enhancing Attention and Interest in Plants to Mitigate Plant Awareness Disparity. Plants, 12(11), 2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112201

Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Ou, S.-R., Arteaga, I. A., & White, B. A. B. (2011). School-Based Early Childhood Education and Age-28 Well-Being: Effects by Timing, Dosage, and Subgroups. Science, 333(6040), 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203618

Richey, R. C. , & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and Development Research. In In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. (pp. 141–150). New York, NY: Springer.

Schussler, E. E., & Olzak, L. A. (2008). It’s not easy being green: student recall of plant and animal images. Journal of Biological Education, 42(3), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2008.9656123

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2020). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5 (GBO-5). Montreal: CBD.

Sert Çıbık, A., & İnce Aka, E. (2021). Investigation of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Attitudes towards Laboratory Skills and Chemistry Laboratory Anxieties According to Selected Variables. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(5), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.375.5

Suwono, H., Maulidia, L., Saefi, M., Kusairi, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2022). The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11505

Thomas, H., Ougham, H., & Sanders, D. (2022). Plant blindness and sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2020-0335

Thoriq, A., & Mahmudah, F. N. (2023). Education For Sustainable Development (Esd): A Systematic Literature Review On Curriculum Development Strategy Design. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i5.4803

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: a roadmap. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448

Uno, G. E. (2009). Botanical literacy: What and how should students learn about plants? American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1753–1759. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900025

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Arif, W. P., Sari, M. S. ., & Lestari, S. R. (2025). Development and Validation of Botani-Co: A Cognitive Botanical Literacy Instrument for University Students. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.825