Implementation of the Problem-Based Learning Model in Islamic Education Subjects to Enhance Students' Problem-Solving Skills

Authors

  • Dosi Cahaya SMP Negeri 08 Lebong, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Perik Ansori SMP Negeri 08 Lebong, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i1.393

Keywords:

Critical Thinking Skills, Islamic Religious Education, Problem-Based Learning, Problem-Solving Ability

Abstract

The phenomenon of low problem-solving abilities among students at SMPN 8 Lebong, especially in the subject of Islamic Religious Education and Character Education, has become the main concern of this study. Students often struggle to relate religious concepts to everyday problems, resulting in underdeveloped critical thinking skills and problem-solving abilities. This study also aims to evaluate the impact of applying the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model on enhancing students’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collection techniques including observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis technique used is interactive data analysis, which involves data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. Data validity is tested using triangulation, by comparing data from various sources to ensure the validity of the findings. The results of the study indicate that: 1) The planning of the PBL model successfully created learning scenarios relevant to students’ everyday lives, facilitating the development of their problem-solving skills. 2) The implementation of PBL was active with group discussions, case studies, and the application of deep problem-solving, enhancing collaboration among students. 3) Evaluation shows that the application of PBL improved students’ problem-solving abilities, with evidence of better problem analysis and more effective solutions. 4) This research shows that the application of the PBL model at SMPN 8 Lebong has a positive impact on improving students’ problem-solving abilities. The main supporting factors for the implementation of PBL include active student involvement, the role of an effective facilitator, and the application of relevant technology. However, there are also some inhibiting factors, such as limited resources, the lack of teacher training related to PBL, and time management challenges that affect the smoothness of the learning process.

References

Afifah, N., & Kurniawan. (2019). Student resistance in problem-based learning: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(2), 123–135.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach (9th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

Artapati, L. W. , & Budiningsih, C.A. (2017). Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum in Elementary Schools in Serayu Yogyakarta. Journal of Educational Technology Innovation, 4(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v4i2.13016

Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage Publications.

Hamdani, H. (2012). Curriculum Development in Education. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hidayati, R. (2017). The role of technology in enhancing problem-based learning effectiveness. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 45–59.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Computers as cognitive tools: Learningwith technology, notfrom technology. J. Comput. High. Educ. 6, 40–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941038

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. ETR&D 48, 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500

Kurniasih, I. & B. S. (2015). Various Models of Learning Development to Enhance Teacher Professionalism. Kata Pena.

Kurniawati, W. (2021). Designing Learning Planning. An-Nur Journal: Studies in Education and Islamic Science, 7(1), 1–10. https://journal.an-nur.ac.id/index.php/annur/article/view/18

Majid, R. & C. R. (2014). Scientific Approaches in the Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ma’rifah, S. (2018). A Theoretical Review: What is Learning? Guidance and Counseling Journal FKIP UNIPA, 35(1), 31–46.

Matthew B Miles, A Michael Huberman, and J. S. (2014). Qualitative Data Anal- ysis : A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications.

Nurkholis. (2013). Education in Efforts to Advance Technology. Educational Journal, 1(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v1i1.530

Piaget, J. (1952). (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. 21-23.

Rahmat, M. (2015). The impact of technological resources on the effectiveness of problem-based learning in schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 245–258.

Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, Qualitative R&D Research Methods. Alfabeta.

Supriadi. (2015). Utilization of Learning Resources in the Learning Process. Lantanida Journal, 3(2), 127–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/lj.v3i2.1654

Suryadi, A. (2016). Training teachers for the effective implementation of problem-based learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 102–114.

Suryadi, E. (2018). Cultural celebrations in Islamic practices: A case study of the Malay community. Indonesian Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(2), 115–130.

Wulandari, D. (2018). Time management challenges in problem-based learning implementation in secondary schools. Journal of Education and Pedagogical Sciences, 9(3), 60–75.

Yarshal, D. (2015). Application of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Model to Improve Activity and Learning Outcomes in Civic Education for 4th Grade Students at MIN Medan in 2014/2015. Thematic Journal, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24114/jt.v5i01.3198

Downloads

Published

2025-01-11

How to Cite

Cahaya, D., & Ansori, P. (2025). Implementation of the Problem-Based Learning Model in Islamic Education Subjects to Enhance Students’ Problem-Solving Skills. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i1.393