Defense R&D Policies, Innovation Capability, and Firm Profitability in Emerging Economies: A Scoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v5i2.918Keywords:
Defense R&D Policy, Emerging Economies, Firm Profitability, Innovation Capability, Scoping ReviewAbstract
This study maps policy instruments, influence pathways, and research gaps connecting defense research and development (R&D) policies, innovation capability, and firm performance in emerging markets, addressing scattered evidence linking these policies to firm profitability. A scoping review was conducted using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Open-access Scopus records were screened using a Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework; 160 records were identified, and 18 studies were included after title, abstract, and full-text assessment. Key instruments identified include public R&D funding, procurement, civil–military integration, offsets, technology transfer, institutional collaboration, cluster or national champion formation, financing support, and business model innovation. These policies are primarily associated with increased R&D intensity, patents, absorptive capacity, technological readiness, commercialization, sales, exports, and productivity. However, direct accounting evidence based on ROA or NPM remains limited, descriptive, or self-reported. This review uniquely synthesizes fragmented evidence on defense R&D policy effectiveness in emerging economies, identifying critical gaps in objective financial performance measurement. Findings guide policymakers in designing evidence-based defense R&D instruments while highlighting the need for standardized accounting metrics to evaluate firm-level outcomes. This research contributes a comprehensive policy-instrument taxonomy and identifies pathways linking defense R&D to innovation and performance, offering a foundational reference for future empirical studies in emerging market contexts.
References
Ana Elena Sancho, F. A. (2025). Shifting foundations: The global realignment of defense industrial policy. Global Trade Alert. https://globaltradealert.org/reports/The-Global-Realignment-of-Defense-Industrial-Policy
Apaydin, F. (2026). Space policy and industrial development in middle powers : Malaysia and Turkey in comparative perspective. Space Policy, 75(August 2025), 101723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2025.101723
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Balakrishnan, K., & Johar, T. N. (2023). Defense and Peace Economics The Role of Stakeholders in Managing Government Research and Development Funding for Defense Industrial Innovation : The Case of The Role of Stakeholders in Managing Government Research and Development Funding for Defense Indus. Defense and Peace Economics, 34(8), 1110–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2022.2100588
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Cohen, & Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080517889-9
Del Monte, A., & Papagni, E. (2003). R&D and the growth of firms: Empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Research Policy, 32(6), 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00107-5
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). the Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dupont-sinhsattanak, A., & Dupont-sinhsattanak, A. (2026). Defense and Peace Economics Modernizing a giant : assessing the impact of military-civil fusion on innovation in China ’ s defense-technological industry on innovation in China ’ s defense-technological industry ABSTRACT. Defense and Peace Economics, 37(2), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2025.2460458
Ehie, I. C., & Olibe, K. (2010). The effect of R&D investment on firm value: An examination of US manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.005
Fairfield, P. M., & Yohn, T. L. (2001). Using asset turnover and profit margin to forecast changes in profitability. Review of Accounting Studies, 6(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012430513430
Hmyria Viktorya, Viktor Nikitchenko, Shynkarenko, O., Aleskerova, Y., & Kostyuk, O. (2024). Development Of The Defense Industry Of Ukraine To Ensure National Security. 3(56), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.56.2024.4366
Irfan, M., Nidar, S. R., Azis, Y., & Widianto, S. (2023). Cogent Business & Management Self-reliant in defense industries : Case study Indonesia Self-reliant in defense industries : Case study Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2262715
Irfan, M., Rahman, S., Azis, Y., & Widianto, S. (2023). Defense industry business performance model in developing countries. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.20
Jang, S. C. (Shawn), & Park, K. (2011). Inter-relationship between firm growth and profitability. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.03.009
Kahl, C. H., & Vestner, T. (2026). How to win the defense innovation contest. Foreignaffairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/how-win-defense-innovation-contest
Kaufman, A., Tucci, C. L., & Brumer, M. (2003). Can creative destruction be destroyed ? Military IR & D and destruction along the value-added chain. 32, 1537–1554.
Kоsova, Т., Raicheva, L., Cherednichenko, S., Horbach, Y., & Chobitko, V. (2025). Financial, credit and budgetary support for the transfer of modern technologies for the modernization of the aerospace complex. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 13, 92–104. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.342029
Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
Mani, S. (2010). The Flight From Defense To Civilian Space : Evolution Of The Sectoral System Of Innovation Of India ’ S Aerospace Industry. (April). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/3167
Manzo, M. A., & Rodríguez, J. C. (2022). Ensuring the High Performance of Design and Engineering Firms in Mexico ’ s Aerospace Industry : A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. 13(April 2021), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i1.4861
Moretti, E., Steinwender, C., & Reenen, J. Van. (2025). The intellectual spoils of war? defense r&d, productivity, and international spillovers. 107(January), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01293
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Patil, K., & Bhaduri, S. (2020). Zero-error versus good-enough’: towards a frugality narrative for defense procurement policy. Mind & Society, 19(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-020-00223-7
PT. Pindad (Persero). (2026). Profil perusahaan [Company profile]. PT Pindad (Persero). Retrieved August 7, 2026, from https://pindad.com/profil-perusahaan
PT. Pindad (Persero). (2019). Annual Report PT. Pindad Tahun 2019. https://pindad.com/annual-report
PT. Pindad (Persero). (2020). Annual Report PT. Pindad Tahun 2020. https://pindad.com/annual-report
PT. Pindad (Persero). (2022). Annual Report PT. Pindad Tahun 2022. https://pindad.com/annual-report
PT. Pindad (Persero). (2021). Annual Report PT. Pindad Tahun 2021. 1–442.
PT. Pindad (Persero). (2023). Annual Report PT. Pindad Tahun 2023. https://pindad.com/annual-report
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 Tentang Industri Pertahanan, Pub. L. 16 (2012).
Yang, J., & Liu, R. (2022). Can Private Enterprises Improve Their Technological Innovation by Joining the Military Business ? Evidence from China. 33(5), 540–553. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.33.5.31399 Military-civilian
Zuluaga, J. A. F., Escobar, J. F., Martínez, G. A. G., Aleman, J. C. D., & Ochoa, A. (2024). Model for measuring technological maturity for critical sector industries Jimmy. 10(December 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100194
Zuniga, P. (2023). Innovation Policy Effectiveness in Emerging Countries: Lessons from Impact Evaluation Studies. World Bank. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/eb246063161707fe707b339a2ea02f86-0050062024/original/Innovation-Policies-Paper.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eko Teguh Wahyudi, Muliahadi Tumanggor, Sri Murtiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
