Homo Complexus: Edgar Morin’s Holistic Reconceptualization of Human Nature in La Méthode 5

Authors

  • Ida Bagus Alit Arta Wiguna Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
  • Ananta Wikrama Tungga Atmaja Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
  • I Nyoman Tika Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Suastra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.656

Keywords:

Homo Complexus, Homo Demens, Human Nature, Human Philosophy

Abstract

The prevailing philosophical and anthropological concepts of Homo Sapiens, Homo Faber, and Homo Economicus have historically understood humanity through a single, dominant trait. This reductionism fails to capture the inherent complexity of human nature. Through a qualitative content analysis of Edgar Morin’s La Méthode 5: L’Humanité de L’Humanité, this study elucidates Morin’s concept of Homo Complexus as a corrective framework. The findings reveal that Morin posits human nature as a productive, Yin-Yang-like tension between rationality (Homo Sapiens) and irrationality/emotion (Homo Demens), where these poles are interdependent and complementary. The study concludes that Homo Complexus provides a more holistic and realistic foundation for understanding human identity, with significant implications for fields like education, which must now account for the full spectrum of rational, emotional, mythical, and aesthetic human dimensions. In this study, a literature review method with a qualitative descriptive research approach is used, discussing primary sources from Edgar Morin’s book and secondary sources from books that discuss the concepts of Homo Sapiens, Homo Faber, Homo Ludens, and Homo Economicus. The findings of the study show that human beings, according to Morin, cannot be understood through only one dimension of their existence but as a combination of elements that interact with each other, such as rationality, emotions, myths, art, and affectivity. The concept of Homo Complexus challenges conventional views that separate humans into narrow categories and offers a more complete understanding of humans. This research has contributed to introducing a humanist and holistic integrative approach in human philosophy. The findings of this research in the field of social sciences provide a new view of humans living complex and dynamic lives.

References

Ailon, G. (2020). The Phenomenology of Homo Economicus. Sociological Theory, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120904981

Aristotle. (2016). Nicomachean Ethics. In Seven Masterpieces of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18254729.12

Aulia, A. R., & Asbari, M. (2022). The Nature of Humans as Homo Faber. Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif (Jupetra), 02(01).

Bergson, H., Landes, D. A., & Grosz, E. (2022). Creative Evolution. In Creative Evolution. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537818

Bode, B. H., & Bergson, H. (1908). L’evolution Creatrice. The Philosophical Review, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2177703

Bozkurt, A., & Durak, G. (2018). A systematic review of gamification research: In pursuit of homo ludens. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2018070102

Cassirer, E. (2023). An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. (Vol. 23). Felix Meiner Verlag.

Cruz Hidalgo, E. (2025). Three routes to Stuart Mill’s political economy: Reflections on the method, the economic man and the social order.

d’Errico, F., & Henshilwood, C. S. (2011). Homo Symbolicus.

Edgar, M. (2012). O método 5: a humanidade da humanidade. Tradução Juremir Machado Da Silva, 5.

Eliade, M. (1959a). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion (Vol. 81). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Eliade, M. (1959b). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion, trans. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc, 229.

Eliade, M., & Culianu, I. P. (1991). The Eliade guide in world religions. Harper San Francisco.

Espinosa, L. (2018). The hand and the Algorithm. A complex anthropology for the technological challenges of the present. In Araucaria (Vol. 20, Issue 40). https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2018.i40.05

Géhin, E., Morin, E., & Gehin, E. (1974). Le paradigme perdu: la nature humaine. Revue Française de Sociologie, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3320266

Gillin, J. L., & Huizinga, J. (1951). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. American Sociological Review, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2087716

Henshilwood, C. S., & d’Errico, F. (2011). Homo symbolicus: the dawn of language, imagination and spirituality. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hinnant, C. H. (1998). The invention of Homo Oeconomicus: A reading of John Stuart Mill’s “On the definition of political economy.” Prose Studies, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/01440359808586653

Huizinga, J. (1971). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Beacon press.

Huizinga, J. (1998). Homo Ludens: a Study of the Play-Element in Culture (The International Library of Sociology: The Sociology of Culture) . Routledge.

Huizinga, J. (2014). Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. In Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315824161

Ihde, D., & Malafouris, L. (2019). Homo faber Revisited: Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory. Philosophy and Technology, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7

Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2016). From Homo Economicus to Homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003

Kristjánsson, K. (2022). Collective Phronesis in Business Ethics Education and Managerial Practice: A Neo-Aristotelian Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04912-2

Latief, J. A. (2024). Humans, philosophy, and history. Bumi Aksara.

Leibowitz, U. D. (2013). Particularism in aristotle’s nicomachean ethics. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1163/174552412X628904

Lorenzi, B., & Andrade, T. (2023). The Paradigm of Complexity in Edgar Morin and the Latourian Epistemology. Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2023.i14.04

Lotto, L. S., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1986). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/1163741

Maffei, S., & Bianchini, M. (2020). Homo faber. In Designing in Dark Times: An Arendtian Lexicon. https://doi.org/10.30554/pe.2.4281.2021

Maharani, S. D. (2016). Humans as Homo Economicus: Reflections on Crime Cases in Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.12624

Mason, M. (2008). Complexity theory and the philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 4–18.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2002). The Qualitative Researchers Companion: Reflections and Advice. In The Qualitative Researchers Companion.

Montuori, A. (2004). Edgar Morin: A partial introduction. World Futures, 60(5–6), 349–355.

Montuori, A. (2008). Edgar Morin’s path of complexity. Morin, E., & Montuori, A. On Complexity. Hampton Press. Https://Www. Academia. Edu/213724/Edgar_Morins_Path_of_Complexity.

Morin, E. (2003). La identidad polimorfa. In El método V. La humanidad de la humanidad. La identidad humana.

Morin, E. (2004). Epistemology of complexity Edgar Morin. Gazeta de Antropología, 20.

Prahastiwi, E. D., Efendi, M., Tobroni, T., & Widodo, J. (2024). THE NATURE OF HUMAN BEINGS: Perspectives from Classical and Modern Experts. Perkumpulan Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia.

Salazar, J. A. A. (2025). Propensiones y derivas del homo: del Homo Sapiens al Homo Complexus Moriniano. Revista Salud y Desarrollo-ReSaDes, 9(1), 1–20.

Singh, R. B., Takahashi, T., Nakaoka, T., Otsuka, K., Toda, E., Shin, H. H., Lee, M. K., Beeharry, V., Hristova, K., Fedacko, J., Pella, D., De Meester, F., Wilson, D. W., Juneja, L. R., & Martirosyan, D. M. (2013). Nutrition in transition from homo sapiens to homo economicus. Open Nutraceuticals Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/1876396001306010006

Siswadi, G. A. (2024). Humans as Homo Complexus: An Introduction to Understanding Humans in the Context of Philosophy. Filsafat Manusia, 1.

Solana Ruiz, J. L. (2020). Bioculturalidad y homo demens. Dos jalones de la antropología compleja. Gazeta de Antropología. https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.13580

Tanghe, K. B. (2016). Homo Ludens (1938) and the crisis in the humanities. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2016.1245087

Thaler, R. H. (2000). From homo economicus to homo sapiens. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.1.133

Vermeulen, P. (2021). Homo Sacer / Homo Demens. The Epistemology of Dementia in Contemporary Literature and Theory. In The Politics of Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110713626-003

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Wiguna, I. B. A. A., Atmaja, A. W. T., Tika, I. N., & Suastra, I. W. (2025). Homo Complexus: Edgar Morin’s Holistic Reconceptualization of Human Nature in La Méthode 5. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2), 1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.656